A) Crash avoidance
B) Crashworthiness
C) Risk compensation
D) Conspicuity
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) defect in design
B) failure to provide adequate instructions
C) failure to warn
D) defect in packaging
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Tim can recover $25, 000 worth of damages from the Ruggers and the rest from the dealership from which he purchased the motorcycle.
B) Tim can recover $50, 000 worth of damages from the motorcycle manufacturer.
C) Tim can recover $50, 000 worth of damages plus any punitive damages that may be awarded by the jury.
D) Tim cannot recover any damages from the motorcycle manufacturer.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) There was a failure to provide adequate instruction on use of the product.
B) There was a failure to warn customers about the possible dangers of using the product.
C) A single item is defectively designed and it has the potential to cause injury.
D) All of the products are defectively designed and have the potential to cause injury.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The consumer was injured due to a supervening event.
B) The consumer had assumed the disclosed risks when purchasing the drug.
C) The side effects suffered by the consumer were generally known dangers of the drug.
D) The consumer abnormally misused the drug.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Clive can bring a strict liability lawsuit against the company for its failure to warn him about the possible dangers of firearms.
B) Clive can bring a strict liability lawsuit against the company for failure to provide adequate instructions on the use of the rifle.
C) Clive cannot take any action because the handling of firearms entails generally known dangers.
D) Clive cannot take any action against the company because he had abnormally misused the product.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Allenby Spares cannot be held strictly liable since the brake was manufactured by TurboDiezel.
B) TurboDiezel cannot be held strictly liable as the company is not the seller in this case.
C) Neither Allenby nor TurboDiezel can be held strictly liable for the faulty brake.
D) Allenby Spares can be held strictly liable for the faulty brake as it is part of the distribution chain.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) negligence per se
B) assumption of risk
C) comparative fault
D) contributory negligence
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Mary can recover from a strict liability lawsuit against the manufacturer of John's car.
B) Mary can file a strict liability lawsuit against John.
C) Mary can file a negligence lawsuit against the dealership that sold John his car.
D) John can file a negligence lawsuit against the dealership from which he bought the car.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Statute of limitations
B) Statute of frauds
C) Statute of general application
D) Statute of repose
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Absolute liability
B) Contingent liability
C) Superior responsibility
D) Strict liability
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 41 - 60 of 80
Related Exams